Holistic Rationality and a Complement Model for Natural Sciences and Christian Theology Interaction
نویسنده
چکیده
A complement model is proposed to account for the interaction between the natural sciences and Christian theology that cultivates cooperation between the two disciplines. This model is based upon a conception of holistic rationality, in which the two main epistemological conceptions of rationality—instrumental and categorical—are enriched in terms of the axiological and metaphysical stances towards what is preferably and possibly knowable and of an epistemic subject’s ethical stance. The axiological and the ethical stances consist of values and virtues, respectively, while the metaphysical stance involves absolute presuppositions. This conception of rationality, in which rules and principles or ends and means, are expanded with respect to values, virtues, and presuppositions, permits an analysis of the interplay between science and theology at a foundational level in terms of the formulation, appraisal, and acceptance of scientific and theological knowledge. Moreover, it provides practitioners in both disciplines an opportunity to combine rationally in a complementary fashion their epistemic claims to form a comprehensive world picture, which captures the world’s complexity but still maintains the integrity of each discipline’s epistemic claims.
منابع مشابه
Jurisprudence and Rationality
There are different concepts of rationality: specific rationality, normative rationality and instrumental rationality whose limitation covers the holistic rationality and represents the fate of rationality in the West. Thus following Hume reason became the slave of feelings and lost its authority for choosing the goal. In Islamic culture reason with its undeniable background in Shariah enjoy...
متن کاملCOMPARATIVE THEOLOGY AS CHALLENGE FOR THE THEOLOGY OF THE 21ST CENTURY
In this article the author first gives an introduction to his own approach to comparative theology (CT). After some introductory considerations, an outline of the idea and foundation of CT is given and is contrasted with traditional approaches to other religions; the methods, goals, and also the limits of CT are discussed; CT is differentiated from religious studies and the theology of religion...
متن کاملContemporary Shifts in the Christian Doctrine of Hell in Anglo-American Philosophical Theology
This problem of hell is a specific form of the problem of evil. The possibility that perhaps a great number of people will end up in an eternal hell is a problem for the Christian who also confesses faith in an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God. In this paper, I shall introduce issuantist views of hell and show that the basic formulations of this perspective do not provide an adeq...
متن کاملA Comparative Study on Political Theology in Western and Islamic Political Thought
The science of the word and theology considered as expertise in area of concern of Islam religion in which it discusses about religious principle, approach and worldview based on rational and narrative reasoning and answer to doubts that pose in this area; in Christianity and in general through all monotheism religions, it could be possible to use this method for religious reasoning, it could b...
متن کاملEthical System in Allāmah Ṭabāṭabāī’s Thoughts on Anthropological Foundations
The ethical system of every school of thought is influenced by the way in which it conceptualizes man, identity, and rationality. The definitions of man, happiness, virtue, good, and pleasure are directed by this way of thinking. Therefore, this research aims to introduce the ethical system established by Allāmah Ṭabāṭabāī in the light of his anthropological foundations. Adopting a descriptive-...
متن کامل